Rangeland Condensate Monthly Reports

Date: Feb 2, 2013

Batch: CRL-112 - Edmonton

Slight decreases in RVP and C4 x C7 concentrations as well as increased BTEX were observed in the February sample of Rangeland Condensate.


Date: Dec 1, 2012

Batch: CRL-087 - Edmonton

A slightly reduced density was observed due to increased C5 x C7 content in the December sample of Rangeland Condensate. slightly reduced MCR and elevated RVP were also observed. No organo-phosphates or oxygenates were detected in this sample.


Date: Oct 4, 2012

Batch: CRL-045 - Edmonton

Rangeland Condensate was consistent with historical averages.


Date: Aug 2, 2012

Batch: CRL-745 - Edmonton

On a seasonally adjusted basis, this month's sample of Rangeland Condensate is typical of historical trends.


Date: Jun 3, 2012

Batch: CRL-717 - Edmonton

Higher density and viscosity measurements resulted from an apparent decline in the C5 x C8 fraction and a corresponding increase in the C13+ "tail". Apart from these changes, all other characteristics of Rangeland Condensate remain reasonably consistent with data compiled to date.


Date: May 1, 2012

Batch: CRL-699 - Edmonton

Although there are limited data with which to compare, the May sample of Rangeland condensate appeared to be consistent with prior samples.


Date: Apr 2, 2012

Batch: CRL-682 - Edmonton

There are still not enough data to comment on the quality and quality trend direction in the Rangeland condensate stream.


Date: Mar 4, 2012

Batch: CRL-669 - Edmonton

Rangeland condensate quality appears to be reasonably consistent, although there are too few samples in the database to make any comments on variability or on data trends.


Date: Feb 2, 2012

Batch: CRL-352 - Edmonton

The sampling and testing program on condensate feeders began in January 2012. There are not enough data in the system at this point to comment on specific qualities or trends.


Date: Jan 10, 2012

Batch: CRL-428 - Edmonton

The sampling and testing program on condensate feeders began in January 2012. There are not enough data in the system at this point to comment on specific qualities or trends.